Skip to main content

civilization and brain damage

facts:

- indigenous people's fight civilization
-- the celts fought the romans
-- the gauls fought the romans
-- the amazonian peoples fight the canadian mining companies

- why fight?
-- because the civilized people act brain damaged
-- they pollute rivers
-- they destroy forests
-- they dig huge holes in the groud
-- that is the behaviour of someone with brain damage

- consider rapa nui aka easter island
-- the civilized people that built the moai
-- did moai users have better reproductive success?
-- did competitive moai (ie. building bigger) have better reproductive success?
-- they chopped down the last tree
-- they lived on an island
-- no trees = no boats = no food

- consider the farmers of the central valley in california or farmers in ancient sumer
-- the water table falling
-- salt increasing
-- increased production leads to decreasing yields
-- http://www.cvsalinity.org/
-- http://related.springerprotocols.com/lp/de-gruyter/salt-seed-and-yields-in-sumerian-agriculture-a-critique-of-the-theory-2exMdpJr9o


- civilization has bred brain damaged humans
-- agricultural has selected for what behaviour?
-- utilizing surplus food for feeding soliders for war
-- fossil fuel use has selected for what behaviour?
-- utilizing fuel as a force multiplier

- cultures that weaponize and exploit resources faster have increased reproductive success
-- heat death is inevitable

- evolution has selected for weaponizers, exploiters, polluters

- consider fossil fuel users - are they better able to reproduce than non-fossil fuel users?

- consider military industrial complex users - are they better able to reproduce than non military industrial complex users?

- consider tar sands oil extractors - are they better able to reproduce than non tar sands oil extractors?

- does not each of these steps lead to more and more desperate measures in order to out compete other organisms for access to vital resources necessary for reproduction?

all roads lead to destruction
all destruction leads to new roads

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

1st hunter - acquisitionist

   Things I know about the first hunter - Acquisitionist all living things are first hunters all other hunters grow from the one before is four things acquisition knockout control ring generalship check hook feint play possum store training fans sponsors promoters defend cover-up parry new word - Acquisitionist think the human infant when  the hunter is intrinsically the weapon singers (celine dion), models (Alessandra Ambrosio), prostitutes (alice little) and boxers (conor mcgregor) are examples what kills the acquisitionist health youth hierarchy  what kills the acquisitionist forces the hunters to upgrade to higher hunting skills godzilla, the hulk, king kong, frankenstein's monster - are fictional examples thieves, bottle collectors and artisanal jade gatherers - they use their knowledge of where resources are to gather resources they kill out of fear or for hunger they die from old age being unable to feed themsleves four ages infant, pre-reproductive, reproduct...

exploit the field of Ningirsu as a(n interest- bearing) loan.

site works best with firefox: https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/stele-vultures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stele_of_the_Vultures from page 21 of  Tracing the Earliest Recorded Concepts of International Law While the “Stele of the Vultures” does not disclose the full terms of the agreement reached between Eanatum, ruler of lagaš, and Enakale, ruler of umma, further details are given in the inscription of Enmetena, Eana- tum’s nephew, E1.9.5.1. According to that inscription, Eanatum, despite his victory over umma, left a strip of land over one km. deep, belonging to lagaš, along the border under umma’s control, According to Eanatum’s inscription on his “Stele of the Vultures” (E1.9.3.1), the ruler of umma was obligated under oath to “exploit the field of Ningirsu as a(n interest- bearing) loan.” According to Enmetena’s inscription, the amount of land umma could use was stipulated by the acreage needed to produce 1 guru (5184 hl.) of grain, at the current ...

humans are make humans weapons

wednesday nov 10 financial times says belarus is instrumentalising migrants. humans makes other humans into weapons to extract resources from other humans. belarus is bringing migrants from syria and iraq to polish border putting pressure on eu and poland. this is strategic from belarus. low risk and low cost attack. it is hard to see what a measured response by poland would be. what can poland do to extract resources from belarus at low cost and low cost? because of its moral commitments poland cant imprison or threaten migrants - but they could promote hussar history in migrant source countries - proudly promoting christian militarism defeating the ottomans. how about the hodow? https://amp.ft.com/content/5524378f-f141-4f6e-8ea4-0f3be0bf27af