Skip to main content

I got this book "Surviving Progress"

In the beginning, I got this book "Surviving Progress" by Ronald Wright. Just the whole idea of civilization collapse was unbelievable to me. Then I started researching it, and I started gathering data, and looking more into it. I got more and more ideas about the scope of the problem from multiple sources. It wasn't just one source.

It was all these different sources, from all these disciplines. All pointing in the same way. The sources weren't necessarily concerned with civilization collapse, but their results pointed that way.
The first stage was acquaintance. Getting introduced to it. The second step was validation, and verification, and research. Confirmation.

Then the third stage was depression, after realizing what would be lost. What it would mean for families. What it would mean for all the things. Also depression about what was being lost. Not just for humans, but for resources, and for plants and animals. That was the depression part.
The next stage was acceptance. Just that this was going to happen. It had happened before. People basically, a lower level of complexity had been established.

People and races continued to survive and live under these new economic conditions. That would happen. That took a while just to get that acceptance. Then I was trying to look at...actually I forgot a phase. Before depression and after validation there was the bargaining phase. Where I was looking at how it could be avoided or how it could be saved, or how you could bargain with it to avoid it. After the bargaining phase ended, it went to the depression.

Then after the depression came the acceptance of this is going to happen, and that we can live with it. Yeah, lots of bad things are going to happen but we'll continue. Then I started trying to think of things that would be useful in the new economy. What would work well? It's like making bikes, or what jobs would be good? What things you should invest in. Should you invest in coal, oil, oil production, or waste reclamation. How to basically turn lead into gold? What's the future?

I was thinking about that and the next phase is looking at... I don't have a name for the phase yet, but basically looking at the collapse, for example, the Maya, you might think, who was able to leave? During the collapse the elites where able to leave first because the settlement records show that farming continued for a couple hundred years after the collapse, even when civilization complexity levels had dropped quite significantly.

That seems to indicate that the white flight or whatever, the elites were able to leave and take their resources and that the poor stayed behind. Just looking at that, what would that look like? Where would elites leave to? Then, what skill sets? Elite's treasures, what would they actually be able to take with them? Well, their assets would typically be an army, peasants, or maybe land.

Basically control of things that don't really move easily, in terms of their wealth that they could carry. Well, they're not going to be able to carry gold, and even if they were carrying it, how valuable would it be in a neighboring civilization that operated at a lower level of complexity. So it's what I'm thinking about now, the stages, and those last days of the collapse, what was actually happening?

The building was on fire, and everybody could smell the smoke. How were people leaving the building? And what did they take with them? And as they left the building, where did they go?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

1st hunter - acquisitionist

   Things I know about the first hunter - Acquisitionist all living things are first hunters all other hunters grow from the one before is four things acquisition knockout control ring generalship check hook feint play possum store training fans sponsors promoters defend cover-up parry new word - Acquisitionist think the human infant when  the hunter is intrinsically the weapon singers (celine dion), models (Alessandra Ambrosio), prostitutes (alice little) and boxers (conor mcgregor) are examples what kills the acquisitionist health youth hierarchy  what kills the acquisitionist forces the hunters to upgrade to higher hunting skills godzilla, the hulk, king kong, frankenstein's monster - are fictional examples thieves, bottle collectors and artisanal jade gatherers - they use their knowledge of where resources are to gather resources they kill out of fear or for hunger they die from old age being unable to feed themsleves four ages infant, pre-reproductive, reproduct...

exploit the field of Ningirsu as a(n interest- bearing) loan.

site works best with firefox: https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/stele-vultures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stele_of_the_Vultures from page 21 of  Tracing the Earliest Recorded Concepts of International Law While the “Stele of the Vultures” does not disclose the full terms of the agreement reached between Eanatum, ruler of lagaš, and Enakale, ruler of umma, further details are given in the inscription of Enmetena, Eana- tum’s nephew, E1.9.5.1. According to that inscription, Eanatum, despite his victory over umma, left a strip of land over one km. deep, belonging to lagaš, along the border under umma’s control, According to Eanatum’s inscription on his “Stele of the Vultures” (E1.9.3.1), the ruler of umma was obligated under oath to “exploit the field of Ningirsu as a(n interest- bearing) loan.” According to Enmetena’s inscription, the amount of land umma could use was stipulated by the acreage needed to produce 1 guru (5184 hl.) of grain, at the current ...

humans are make humans weapons

wednesday nov 10 financial times says belarus is instrumentalising migrants. humans makes other humans into weapons to extract resources from other humans. belarus is bringing migrants from syria and iraq to polish border putting pressure on eu and poland. this is strategic from belarus. low risk and low cost attack. it is hard to see what a measured response by poland would be. what can poland do to extract resources from belarus at low cost and low cost? because of its moral commitments poland cant imprison or threaten migrants - but they could promote hussar history in migrant source countries - proudly promoting christian militarism defeating the ottomans. how about the hodow? https://amp.ft.com/content/5524378f-f141-4f6e-8ea4-0f3be0bf27af